Comprehension : Comprehension

Q 47 / 466

UPSC CSE Prelims 2025

Passage - In our country, handlooms are equated with a culture that ensures a continuity of tradition. This idea has become part of the public policy-framing and provides a legitimate basis for the State to support the sector. But the notion of tradition as a single, linear entity is being strongly contested today. The narratives dominant in defining culture/tradition in a particular way are seen to have emerged as the identities and histories of large sections. The discounted and, at times, forcibly stifled identities are fighting for their rightful place in history. Against this backdrop, when we promote handloom as a traditional industry, it is not surprising that large sections of our population choose to ignore it.

Which one of the following statements best reflects the most logical and rational message conveyed by the author of the passage?

EXPLANATION

Correct Option (A)

The passage critically examines the prevailing narrative that equates handlooms solely with a singular, continuous tradition, a perspective often supported by state policy. It argues that this narrow definition marginalizes diverse identities and histories, leading to a lack of broader public engagement with the sector. Therefore, the most logical message conveyed is the necessity to liberate the handloom industry from this restrictive cultural heritage narrative to enhance its relevance and inclusivity.

Incorrect Options:

  • Option (B): This statement contradicts the author's central argument. The passage explicitly questions the efficacy and inclusivity of state support when it is tied to a contested, singular notion of tradition, rather than endorsing such preservation efforts.

  • Option (C): The passage's primary concern is not the modernization or economic viability of household units within the handloom sector. Instead, it focuses on the cultural and historical narratives surrounding handlooms and their impact on public perception and policy.

  • Option (D): The author does not suggest converting handloom products into machine-made designer items. This option introduces a solution that is outside the scope of the passage's discussion, which centers on the cultural framing and perception of handlooms.