Economic liberalization in India was shaped Iargely.by the economic problems of the government than by the economic priorities of the people or by the long-term development objectives. Thus, there were limitations in conception and design which have been subsequently validated by experience. Jobless growth, persistent poverty and rising inequality have mounted as problems since economic liberalization began. And all these years later, four quiet crises confront the economy; agriculture, infrastructure, industrialization and education as constraints on the country's future prospects. These problems must be resolved if economic growth has to be sustained and transformed into meaningful development.
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
The passage indicates that neither of the assumptions is valid. It critically assesses the outcomes of economic liberalization in India, pointing to its limitations in conception and design. The text highlights adverse consequences such as jobless growth, persistent poverty, and rising inequality, and identifies internal structural challenges in agriculture, infrastructure, industrialization, and education as crucial constraints on the country's future prospects. The passage does not advocate for greater global economic integration, nor does it support the idea that liberalization alone would resolve poverty and unemployment.