Comprehension : Comprehension

Q 188 / 466

UPSC CSE Prelims 2019

The rural poor across the world, including India, have contributed little to human-induced climate change, yet they are on the frontline in coping with its effects. Farmers can no longer rely on historical averages for rainfall and temperature, and the more frequent and extreme weather events, such as droughts and floods, can spell disaster. And there are new threats, such as sea level rise and the impact of melting glaciers on water supply. How significant are small farms? As many as two billion people worldwide depend on them for their food and livelihood. Small-holder farmers in India produce 41 percent of the country's food grains, and other food items that contribute to local and national food security.

What is the most logical and rational corollary to the above passage?

EXPLANATION

Correct Option (A)

The passage highlights the significant role of small-holder farmers in ensuring global and national food security, particularly in India, where they contribute substantially to food grain production. Concurrently, it emphasizes their extreme vulnerability to the adverse impacts of climate change, despite their minimal contribution to its causes. Therefore, any comprehensive agenda for environmentally sustainable development must integrate support for these farmers, as their well-being is intrinsically linked to both food security and climate resilience. This option directly synthesizes the two main themes of the passage: the importance of small farmers and their susceptibility to climate change, within the framework of sustainable development.

Incorrect Options:

Option B: The passage states that the rural poor, including small farmers, have contributed little to human-induced climate change. However, this does not imply that poor countries have no role in climate change mitigation. Mitigation efforts can encompass various strategies, including sustainable agricultural practices, which are relevant to developing nations. The statement draws an unwarranted conclusion.

Option C: While the passage acknowledges the significant contribution of small-holder farmers to India's food security, it also explicitly details the severe threats posed by climate change, such as droughts, floods, and altered weather patterns, which "can spell disaster." These threats directly jeopardize food security. Therefore, concluding that India will not face food security problems in the foreseeable future is a premature and unsupported inference, as it overlooks the significant challenges highlighted.

Option D: The passage underscores the importance of small-holder farmers in contributing to food security. However, it does not assert that "only" small-holder farmers can ensure food security. Such an exclusive claim is not supported by the text, as food security is a complex issue influenced by multiple factors, including large-scale agriculture, technological advancements, and government policies.